<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: fckeditor vs tinymce vs everything else</title>
	<atom:link href="http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/</link>
	<description>php, linux, ajax, javascript, kae verens</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-110493</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-110493</guid>
		<description>For two years, i try to install that fckeditor from time to time, hoping they fixed compatibility issues in current version, and whenever i step into their forum to see what's the problem, I see more people with the same problem like me, and we are all together wondering, helpless and clueless. Their support for non paying customers is horrible... or they don't know because that app became a monster...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For two years, i try to install that fckeditor from time to time, hoping they fixed compatibility issues in current version, and whenever i step into their forum to see what&#8217;s the problem, I see more people with the same problem like me, and we are all together wondering, helpless and clueless. Their support for non paying customers is horrible&#8230; or they don&#8217;t know because that app became a monster&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-99957</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-99957</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply Kae. FCK will stay on our short list of editors (tinyMCE, FCKEditor and CuteEditor by CuteSoft).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Kae. FCK will stay on our short list of editors (tinyMCE, FCKEditor and CuteEditor by CuteSoft).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kae Verens</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-99950</link>
		<dc:creator>Kae Verens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-99950</guid>
		<description>no. I'm still using FCKeditor. It's not ideal (to my eyes), but its stability is improving, and the developer community, while a bit acerbic in my opinion, do a very good job.

FCKeditor is a very good rich-text-editor in my opinion. I know I had trouble with it in the past, and will probably have trouble with it in the future, but I think that its benefits vastly outweigh its detriments.

I'd recommend FCKeditor. Make sure you use the latest version, as some recent versions don't work well with Firefox 3, especially if you dynamically create FCKeditor textareas (for example, if using AJAX extensively).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no. I&#8217;m still using FCKeditor. It&#8217;s not ideal (to my eyes), but its stability is improving, and the developer community, while a bit acerbic in my opinion, do a very good job.</p>
<p>FCKeditor is a very good rich-text-editor in my opinion. I know I had trouble with it in the past, and will probably have trouble with it in the future, but I think that its benefits vastly outweigh its detriments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend FCKeditor. Make sure you use the latest version, as some recent versions don&#8217;t work well with Firefox 3, especially if you dynamically create FCKeditor textareas (for example, if using AJAX extensively).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-99946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-99946</guid>
		<description>Did you ever find a replacement to FCKeditor? I am curious as currently I am looking to replace FTB (free text box) and FCKeditor was one of the candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever find a replacement to FCKeditor? I am curious as currently I am looking to replace FTB (free text box) and FCKeditor was one of the candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Arce</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-92839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Arce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-92839</guid>
		<description>Si te interesa leer otro artículo comparando FCK Editor vs TinyMCE en español puedes visitar http://www.intergraphicdesigns.com/blog/html-css-ajax/2008/05/editores-wysisyg-fckeditor-vs-tinymce.html, donde se explica un poco de las experiencias que hemos tenido usando ambas herramientas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Si te interesa leer otro artículo comparando FCK Editor vs TinyMCE en español puedes visitar <a href="http://www.intergraphicdesigns.com/blog/html-css-ajax/2008/05/editores-wysisyg-fckeditor-vs-tinymce.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.intergraphicdesigns.com/blog/html-css-ajax/2008/05/editores-wysisyg-fckeditor-vs-tinymce.html</a>, donde se explica un poco de las experiencias que hemos tenido usando ambas herramientas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kadir Atesoglu</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-85105</link>
		<dc:creator>Kadir Atesoglu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-85105</guid>
		<description>May be you can try TinyMCE, for a few hours, i've been looking for the same solution as you did and i'm getting the result that tinymce could be better than fckeditor.

http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

All the best...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be you can try TinyMCE, for a few hours, i&#8217;ve been looking for the same solution as you did and i&#8217;m getting the result that tinymce could be better than fckeditor.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/</a></p>
<p>All the best&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Parry</title>
		<link>http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/comment-page-1/#comment-61095</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else/#comment-61095</guid>
		<description>I've been looking into Xinha recently, and from the surface it looks pretty good. I'm not a huge Javascript coder, so I've not really delved into the code yet - although I probably will at some point as I'll most likely need to write my own plugins to get it exactly as I want it. http://xinha.webfactional.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking into Xinha recently, and from the surface it looks pretty good. I&#8217;m not a huge Javascript coder, so I&#8217;ve not really delved into the code yet - although I probably will at some point as I&#8217;ll most likely need to write my own plugins to get it exactly as I want it. <a href="http://xinha.webfactional.com/" rel="nofollow">http://xinha.webfactional.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
