Comments on: fckeditor vs tinymce vs everything else

By: Twitter Trackbacks for fckeditor vs tinymce vs everything else « klog [verens.com] on Topsy.com

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:24:10 +0000

[...] fckeditor vs tinymce vs everything else « klog verens.com/archives/2007/09/27/fckeditor-vs-tinymce-vs-everything-else – view page – cached [...]

By: Kae Verens

Kae Verens — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:17:58 +0000

@Kadir, I’d have to agree. I am /very/ impressed with the responsiveness of the new CKEditor 3. It’s totally redone with modern needs (specifically AJAX and dynamic creation/destruction of editors) in mind.

By: Kadir Atesoglu

Kadir Atesoglu — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:24:32 +0000

A year ago, in this discussion, i’ve said that you should give tinymce a try. But in the past months, lots of things have changed just like developments of both versions of editors. Now i should correct myself with looking that view and say fckeditor is the winner with a deep impression.

fyi; if u’re looking for enhanced tools for developing in .net, devexpress controls will fit best for your needs and lift you for a fews step up. don’t hesitate to try.

By: Boris

Boris — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:56:56 +0000

For two years, i try to install that fckeditor from time to time, hoping they fixed compatibility issues in current version, and whenever i step into their forum to see what’s the problem, I see more people with the same problem like me, and we are all together wondering, helpless and clueless. Their support for non paying customers is horrible… or they don’t know because that app became a monster…

By: Jesse

Jesse — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:57:25 +0000

Thanks for the reply Kae. FCK will stay on our short list of editors (tinyMCE, FCKEditor and CuteEditor by CuteSoft).

By: Kae Verens

Kae Verens — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:39:37 +0000

no. I’m still using FCKeditor. It’s not ideal (to my eyes), but its stability is improving, and the developer community, while a bit acerbic in my opinion, do a very good job.

FCKeditor is a very good rich-text-editor in my opinion. I know I had trouble with it in the past, and will probably have trouble with it in the future, but I think that its benefits vastly outweigh its detriments.

I’d recommend FCKeditor. Make sure you use the latest version, as some recent versions don’t work well with Firefox 3, especially if you dynamically create FCKeditor textareas (for example, if using AJAX extensively).

By: Jesse

Jesse — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:38:42 +0000

Did you ever find a replacement to FCKeditor? I am curious as currently I am looking to replace FTB (free text box) and FCKeditor was one of the candidates.

By: Ricardo Arce

Ricardo Arce — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:12:16 +0000

Si te interesa leer otro artículo comparando FCK Editor vs TinyMCE en español puedes visitar http://www.intergraphicdesigns.com/blog/html-css-ajax/2008/05/editores-wysisyg-fckeditor-vs-tinymce.html, donde se explica un poco de las experiencias que hemos tenido usando ambas herramientas.

By: Kadir Atesoglu

Kadir Atesoglu — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:14:18 +0000

May be you can try TinyMCE, for a few hours, i’ve been looking for the same solution as you did and i’m getting the result that tinymce could be better than fckeditor.

http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

All the best…

By: Dylan Parry

Dylan Parry — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:06:26 +0000

I’ve been looking into Xinha recently, and from the surface it looks pretty good. I’m not a huge Javascript coder, so I’ve not really delved into the code yet – although I probably will at some point as I’ll most likely need to write my own plugins to get it exactly as I want it. http://xinha.webfactional.com/